The Nuremberg Code and the Nuremberg Trial: A Reappraisal
JAMA. 1996 Nov 27; 276(20): 1662-1666.
The Nuremberg Code includes 10 principles to guide physician-investigators in experiments involving human subjects. These principles, particularly the first principle on "voluntary consent," primarily were based on legal concepts because medical codes of ethics existent at the time of the Nazi atrocities did not address consent and other safeguards for human subjects. The US judges who presided over the proceedings did not intend the Code to apply only to the case before them, to be a response to the atrocities committed by the Nazi physicians, or to be inapplicable to research as it is customarily carried on in medical institutions. Instead, a careful reading of the judgment suggests that they wrote the Code for the practice of human experimentation whenever it is being conducted.
Autonomy; Codes of Ethics; Communitarianism; Consent; Disclosure; Ethics; Evaluation; Guidelines; Historical Aspects; Human Experimentation; Informed Consent; International Aspects; Investigators; Killing; Law; Misconduct; National Socialism; Nontherapeutic Research; Organizational Policies; Organizations; Patients; Physicians; Professional Organizations; Research; Research Subjects; Rights; Scientific Misconduct; Socialism; Therapeutic Research; Torture; Trust; Western World;
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
US Medical Researchers, the Nuremberg Doctors Trial, and the Nuremberg Code: A Review of Findings of the Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments Faden, Ruth R.; Lederer, Susan E.; Moreno, Jonathan D. (1996-11-27)The Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments (ACHRE), established to review allegations of abuses of human subjects in federally sponsored radiation research, was charged with identifying appropriate standards to ...