Ought We to Sentence People to Psychiatric Treatment?
Bioethics. 1997 Jul-Oct; 11(3-4): 298-308.
In principle, there seem to be three main ways in which society can react when people commit crimes under influence of mental illness. (1) The standard model. We excuse them. If they are dangerous they are detained in the interest of safety of the rest of the citizens. (2) The Swedish model. We hold them responsible for their criminal offence, we convict them, but we do not sentence them to jail. Instead, we sentence them to psychiatric treatment. (3) My model. We sentence them to jail, but offer them (voluntary) psychiatric treatment. The advantages of my model are obvious. We get a clear delineation of roles. We allow the psychiatrist to be just a doctor, not a warden. We liberate psychiatry of the objective of deciding whether people who were mentally ill when they committed criminal offences 'could have acted otherwise' -- a hopeless task. We allow that psychiatrists live up to their professional ethical code (The Hawaii Declaration). We treat psychically ill persons as 'normal', we allow them to repent their crimes, which renders easier their recovery. However, two objections to my model come to mind. First of all, is it not unfair to sentence people to jail who could not help doing what they did? And, secondly, the question of fairness set to one side, is it not inhumane to sentence mentally ill persons to jail? Is it not inhumane to the mentally ill persons themselves, and does it not mean that they will be a burden to other prisoners? In my paper I show that, if our system of criminal punishment takes a civilised form, neither of these objections carries any weight.
Child Abuse; Coercion; Competence; Criminal Law; Dangerousness; Dehumanization; Ethics; Expert Testimony; Forensic Psychiatry; Involuntary Commitment; Illness; Justice; Killing; Law; Law Enforcement; Medical Ethics; Mentally Ill Persons; Mental Illness; Patient Care; Prisoners; Psychiatry; Punishment; Utilitarianism; Violence; Theoretical Models;
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Tannsjo, Torbjorn (1992-10)Is it defensible that society spends money on medical or research projects intended to help people solve their fertility problems? Suppose that we want to answer this question from the point of view of a utilitarian cost-benefit ...
Tannsjo, Torbjorn (1994-02)The paper is a record of a debate which took place between a group of clinicians and the author concerning a clinical trial of a drug supposed to postpone the time when HIV-patients develop AIDS. A problem with the trial ...