Choosing the Best: Against Paternalistic Practice Guidelines
Bioethics. 1996 Oct; 10(4): 323-330.
Isobel Ross rightly points out that providing information is not enough to guarantee that patients will choose the best course of action. She argues that to adequately protect patients' interests, we need practice guidelines to 'ensure that dangerous and unnecessarily risky procedures are excluded from practice'. What constitutes an 'unnecessarily risky procedure' is to be determined by a group of reasonable doctors. At one point, Ross suggests that such guidelines are 'presumptive' rather than 'absolute'. But this is really a concession to patient variability. She intends that certain procedures are ruled out on paternalistic grounds. I will argue that practice guidelines are desirable but should not determine practice. We should not rule out procedures on paternalistic grounds.
Alternatives; Autonomy; Communication; Consensus; Consent; Decision Making; Disclosure; Doctors; Evaluation; Guidelines; Informed Consent; Medical Specialties; Methods; Paternalism; Patient Care; Patients; Practice Guidelines; Professional Autonomy; Risks and Benefits; Standards; Surgery; Technical Expertise; Values;
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Savulescu, Julian; Kahane, Guy (2009-06)According to what we call the Principle of Procreative Beneficence (PB),couples who decide to have a child have a significant moral reason to select the child who, given his or her genetic endowment, can be expected to ...
Golombok, Susan; Schulman, Joe; Dahl, Edgar; McLean, Sheila; Doyal, Len; Lotts, Jim; Lockwood, Gillian; Bhargava, Pushpa; McMahan, Jeff; Alikani, Mina; Lotz, Mianna; Te Velde, Egbert; Savulescu, Julian (2005-03)