Show simple item record

dc.creatorSiegert, Elisabeth A.en
dc.creatorClipp, Elizabeth C.en
dc.creatorMulhausen, Paulen
dc.creatorKochersberger, Garyen
dc.date.accessioned2015-05-05T18:58:59Zen
dc.date.available2015-05-05T18:58:59Zen
dc.date.created1996-04en
dc.date.issued1996-04en
dc.identifier10.1001/archfami.5.4.207en
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationArchives of Family Medicine. 1996 Apr; 5(4): 207-212.en
dc.identifier.issn1063-3987en
dc.identifier.urihttp://worldcatlibraries.org/registry/gateway?version=1.0&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&atitle=Impact+of+Advance+Directive+Videotape+on+Patient+Comprehension+And+treatment+Preferences&title=Archives+of+Family+Medicine.++&volume=5&issue=4&pages=207-212&date=1996&au=Siegert,+Elisabeth+A.en
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archfami.5.4.207en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10822/750194en
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: To examine the effects of an advance directive videotape on patient comprehension of advance directive concepts and preferences for resuscitation. DESIGN: Pilot study, randomized cohort trial. SETTING: Extended Care and Rehabilitation Center, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, NC. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-six residents of the center; mean age, 69 years. INTERVENTIONS: Sixteen subjects observed an advance directive videotape, and 20 subjects observed a health-relative videotape. All subjects received written material and counseling on advance directives. MEASUREMENT: Structured interviews were conducted at three time points relative to the educational program (pretest, posttest, delayed posttest), measuring comprehension of two advance directive concepts (living will and cardiopulmonary resuscitation) and resuscitation preferences based on hypothetical clinical vignettes. Mean comprehension and mean resuscitation preference scores were derived for each time point. RESULTS: The mean comprehension score improved an average of 1.6 points for all subjects from pretest to delayed posttest (P less than .001); however, score changes were not significantly different between the two video groups (P = .39). Mean resuscitation preference scores were stable over time, and there were no significant score differences between the two video groups. CONCLUSION: The advance directive videotape did not significantly affect resuscitation preferences or comprehension of selected advance directive concepts.en
dc.formatArticleen
dc.languageenen
dc.sourceBRL:MEDKIE/96365731en
dc.subjectAdvance Directivesen
dc.subjectAgeden
dc.subjectAidsen
dc.subjectAllowing to Dieen
dc.subjectAttitudesen
dc.subjectComprehensionen
dc.subjectControl Groupsen
dc.subjectCounselingen
dc.subjectEducationen
dc.subjectEvaluationen
dc.subjectEvaluation Studiesen
dc.subjectHealthen
dc.subjectInterviewsen
dc.subjectKnowledgeen
dc.subjectLifeen
dc.subjectLiving Willsen
dc.subjectNursing Homesen
dc.subjectPatientsen
dc.subjectProlongation of Lifeen
dc.subjectRehabilitationen
dc.subjectResuscitationen
dc.subjectResuscitation Ordersen
dc.subjectTreatment Outcomeen
dc.subjectTreatment Refusalen
dc.subjectWillsen
dc.titleImpact of Advance Directive Videotape on Patient Comprehension and Treatment Preferencesen
dc.provenanceDigital citation created by the National Reference Center for Bioethics Literature at Georgetown University for the BIOETHICSLINE database, part of the Kennedy Institute of Ethics' Bioethics Information Retrieval Project funded by the United States National Library of Medicine.en
dc.provenanceDigital citation migrated from OpenText LiveLink Discovery Server database named NBIO hosted by the Bioethics Research Library to the DSpace collection BioethicsLine hosted by Georgetown University.en


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


Georgetown University Seal
©2009—2023 Bioethics Research Library
Box 571212 Washington DC 20057-1212
202.687.3885