Show simple item record

dc.creatorWeindling, Paulen
dc.date.accessioned2015-05-05T19:00:10Zen
dc.date.available2015-05-05T19:00:10Zen
dc.date.created1996-12-07en
dc.date.issued1996-12-07en
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationBMJ (British Medical Journal). 1996 Dec 7; 313(7070): 1467-1470.en
dc.identifier.issn0959-8138en
dc.identifier.urihttp://worldcatlibraries.org/registry/gateway?version=1.0&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&atitle=Human+Guinea+Pigs+and+the+Ethics+of+Experimentation:+the&title=BMJ+&volume=313&issue=7070&pages=1467-1470&date=1996&au=Weindling,+Paulen
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10822/751255en
dc.description.abstractThough the Nuremberg medical trial was a United States military tribunal, British forensic pathologists supplied extensive evidence for the trial. The BMJ had a correspondent at the trial, and he endorsed a utilitarian legitimation of clinical experiments, justifying the medical research carried out under Nazism as of long term scientific benefit despite the human costs. The British supported an international medical commission to evaluate the ethics and scientific quality of German research. Medical opinions differed over whether German medical atrocities should be given publicity or treated in confidence. The BMJ's correspondent warned against medical researchers being taken over by a totalitarian state, and these arguments were used to oppose the NHS and any state control over medical research.en
dc.formatArticleen
dc.languageenen
dc.sourceBRL:MEDKIE/97128679en
dc.subjectAttitudesen
dc.subjectCommunicable Diseasesen
dc.subjectConsenten
dc.subjectEditorial Policiesen
dc.subjectEthicsen
dc.subjectEvaluationen
dc.subjectFrauden
dc.subjectHealthen
dc.subjectHistorical Aspectsen
dc.subjectHuman Experimentationen
dc.subjectImmunizationen
dc.subjectInformed Consenten
dc.subjectInternational Aspectsen
dc.subjectInvestigatorsen
dc.subjectMisconducten
dc.subjectMedical Researchen
dc.subjectNational Socialismen
dc.subjectNutritionen
dc.subjectNazismen
dc.subjectOrganizationsen
dc.subjectPhysiciansen
dc.subjectPoliticsen
dc.subjectPrisonersen
dc.subjectProfessional Organizationsen
dc.subjectResearchen
dc.subjectResearchersen
dc.subjectReviewen
dc.subjectScientific Misconducten
dc.subjectSocialismen
dc.subjectState Controlen
dc.subjectVolunteersen
dc.titleHuman Guinea Pigs and the Ethics of Experimentation: Theen
dc.provenanceDigital citation created by the National Reference Center for Bioethics Literature at Georgetown University for the BIOETHICSLINE database, part of the Kennedy Institute of Ethics' Bioethics Information Retrieval Project funded by the United States National Library of Medicine.en
dc.provenanceDigital citation migrated from OpenText LiveLink Discovery Server database named NBIO hosted by the Bioethics Research Library to the DSpace collection BioethicsLine hosted by Georgetown University.en


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


Georgetown University Seal
©2009—2023 Bioethics Research Library
Box 571212 Washington DC 20057-1212
202.687.3885