Women, Forced Caesareans and Antenatal Responsibilities
Journal of Medical Ethics. 1996 Dec; 22(6): 327-333.
In the UK in October 1992, Mrs S was forced to have a caesarean section despite her objections to such a procedure on religious grounds. The case once again called into question the obligations of women to the unborn, and also whether one person can be forced to undergo a medical procedure for the benefit of someone else. Re S, like the case of Angela Carder, is often discussed in terms of the conflict between maternal and fetal rights. This paper looks instead at our obligations to save life in general -- whether or not we are pregnant -- and at the obligations of mothers to their children -- whether they are born or unborn. Drawing on Judith Jarvis Thomson's distinction, it argues that minimal decency informs the duties which are owed to strangers, but that parents can be expected to behave as Good Samaritans towards their children. Finally, it is argued that even if mothers are ethically obliged to consent to caesarean sections which will save the lives of their babies, this does not necessarily mean that others are at liberty, or even obliged, to proceed with such operations without their consent.
Autonomy; Bone Marrow; Cancer; Cesarean Section; Childbirth; Children; Coercion; Consent; Family Members; Females; Fetuses; Injuries; Justice; Judicial Action; Life; Males; Moral Obligations; Moral Policy; Mother Fetus Relationship; Mothers; Motivation; Parent Child Relationship; Parental Consent; Parents; Physicians; Pregnant Women; Prenatal Injuries; Religion; Rights; Responsibilities; Smoking; Tissue Donation; Treatment Refusal; Value of Life; Viability; Women's Rights;
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Draper, Heather (1996-12)
Draper, Heather (1994-10)
Becoming a father/refusing fatherhood: an empirical bioethics approach to paternal responsibilities and rights Ives, Jonathan; Draper, Heather; Pattison, Helen; Williams, Clare (2008-06)In this paper, we present the first stage of an empirical bioethics project exploring the moral sources of paternal responsibilities and rights. In doing so, we present both (1) data on men's normative constructions of ...