Defending Commercial Surrogate Motherhood Against Van Niekerk and Van Zyl
McLachlan, Hugh V.
Journal of Medical Ethics. 1997 Dec; 23(6): 344-348.
The arguments of Van Niekerk and Van Zyl that, on the grounds that it involves an inappropriate commodification and alienation of women's labour, commercial surrogate motherhood (CSM) is morally suspect are discussed and considered to be defective. In addition, doubt is cast on the notion that CSM should be illegal.
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
McLachlan, Hugh V. (1997-12)
Babies, Child Bearers and Commodification: Anderson, Brazier Et Al., and the Political Economy of Commercial Surrogate Motherhood McLachlan, Hugh V.; Swales, J.K. (2000)
Galbraith, Mhairi; McLachlan, Hugh V.; Swales, J. Kim (2005-03)In this paper we investigate the legal arrangements involved in UK surrogate motherhood from a transaction-cost perspective. We outline the specific forms the transaction costs take and critically comment on the way in ...