dc.creator | Berger, Jeffrey T. | en |
dc.creator | Rosner, Fred | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2015-05-05T19:01:31Z | en |
dc.date.available | 2015-05-05T19:01:31Z | en |
dc.date.created | 1996-10-14 | en |
dc.date.issued | 1996-10-14 | en |
dc.identifier | 10.1001/archinte.156.18.2051 | en |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | Archives of Internal Medicine. 1996 Oct 14; 156(18): 2051-2056. | en |
dc.identifier.issn | 0003-9926 | en |
dc.identifier.uri | http://worldcatlibraries.org/registry/gateway?version=1.0&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&atitle=The+Ethics+of+Practice+Guidelines&title=Archives+of+Internal+Medicine.++&volume=156&issue=18&pages=2051-2056&date=1996&au=Berger,+Jeffrey+T. | en |
dc.identifier.uri | http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archinte.156.18.2051 | en |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10822/752742 | en |
dc.description.abstract | Practice guidelines, which are assistive tools for clinicians, have a
long tradition in clinical medicine. Traditionally, these documents were
developed by physicians to improve quality of care and can provide
practitioners with valuable medical information and improve objectivity in
medical decision making. Guidelines development by nonphysician groups is
increasing. Guidelines are now intended to assist in decreasing costs, in
reducing liability risk, and in utilization review, among other activities.
Despite this enthusiasm for guidelines, their development is variable and
validity remains largely untested. The intended clinical and nonclinical
applications of guidelines require critical analysis. Practice guidelines are
not inherently unethical. However, applications of nonmedical values combined
with intense pressures on health care provision create an environment for
guideline misuse. The ethical implications of practice guidelines are examined
in our article. | en |
dc.format | Article | en |
dc.language | en | en |
dc.source | BRL:MEDKIE/97015415 | en |
dc.subject | Autonomy | en |
dc.subject | Beneficence | en |
dc.subject | Competence | en |
dc.subject | Conflict of Interest | en |
dc.subject | Costs and Benefits | en |
dc.subject | Consent | en |
dc.subject | Decision Making | en |
dc.subject | Economics | en |
dc.subject | Environment | en |
dc.subject | Ethics | en |
dc.subject | Goals | en |
dc.subject | Guidelines | en |
dc.subject | Health | en |
dc.subject | Health Care | en |
dc.subject | Health Care Delivery | en |
dc.subject | Informed Consent | en |
dc.subject | Life | en |
dc.subject | Liability | en |
dc.subject | Managed Care Programs | en |
dc.subject | Medical Ethics | en |
dc.subject | Medicine | en |
dc.subject | Managed Care | en |
dc.subject | Patient Advocacy | en |
dc.subject | Patient Care | en |
dc.subject | Patients | en |
dc.subject | Physician Patient Relationship | en |
dc.subject | Physicians | en |
dc.subject | Practice Guidelines | en |
dc.subject | Professional Competence | en |
dc.subject | Quality of Health Care | en |
dc.subject | Quality of Life | en |
dc.subject | Resource Allocation | en |
dc.subject | Review | en |
dc.subject | Risk | en |
dc.subject | Selection for Treatment | en |
dc.subject | Standards | en |
dc.subject | Treatment Outcome | en |
dc.subject | Values | en |
dc.title | The Ethics of Practice Guidelines | en |
dc.provenance | Digital citation created by the National Reference Center for Bioethics Literature at Georgetown University for the BIOETHICSLINE database, part of the Kennedy Institute of Ethics' Bioethics Information Retrieval Project funded by the United States National Library of Medicine. | en |
dc.provenance | Digital citation migrated from OpenText LiveLink Discovery Server database named NBIO hosted by the Bioethics Research Library to the DSpace collection BioethicsLine hosted by Georgetown University. | en |