Show simple item record

dc.creatorBerger, Jeffrey T.en
dc.creatorRosner, Freden
dc.date.accessioned2015-05-05T19:01:31Zen
dc.date.available2015-05-05T19:01:31Zen
dc.date.created1996-10-14en
dc.date.issued1996-10-14en
dc.identifier10.1001/archinte.156.18.2051en
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationArchives of Internal Medicine. 1996 Oct 14; 156(18): 2051-2056.en
dc.identifier.issn0003-9926en
dc.identifier.urihttp://worldcatlibraries.org/registry/gateway?version=1.0&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&atitle=The+Ethics+of+Practice+Guidelines&title=Archives+of+Internal+Medicine.++&volume=156&issue=18&pages=2051-2056&date=1996&au=Berger,+Jeffrey+T.en
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archinte.156.18.2051en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10822/752742en
dc.description.abstractPractice guidelines, which are assistive tools for clinicians, have a long tradition in clinical medicine. Traditionally, these documents were developed by physicians to improve quality of care and can provide practitioners with valuable medical information and improve objectivity in medical decision making. Guidelines development by nonphysician groups is increasing. Guidelines are now intended to assist in decreasing costs, in reducing liability risk, and in utilization review, among other activities. Despite this enthusiasm for guidelines, their development is variable and validity remains largely untested. The intended clinical and nonclinical applications of guidelines require critical analysis. Practice guidelines are not inherently unethical. However, applications of nonmedical values combined with intense pressures on health care provision create an environment for guideline misuse. The ethical implications of practice guidelines are examined in our article.en
dc.formatArticleen
dc.languageenen
dc.sourceBRL:MEDKIE/97015415en
dc.subjectAutonomyen
dc.subjectBeneficenceen
dc.subjectCompetenceen
dc.subjectConflict of Interesten
dc.subjectCosts and Benefitsen
dc.subjectConsenten
dc.subjectDecision Makingen
dc.subjectEconomicsen
dc.subjectEnvironmenten
dc.subjectEthicsen
dc.subjectGoalsen
dc.subjectGuidelinesen
dc.subjectHealthen
dc.subjectHealth Careen
dc.subjectHealth Care Deliveryen
dc.subjectInformed Consenten
dc.subjectLifeen
dc.subjectLiabilityen
dc.subjectManaged Care Programsen
dc.subjectMedical Ethicsen
dc.subjectMedicineen
dc.subjectManaged Careen
dc.subjectPatient Advocacyen
dc.subjectPatient Careen
dc.subjectPatientsen
dc.subjectPhysician Patient Relationshipen
dc.subjectPhysiciansen
dc.subjectPractice Guidelinesen
dc.subjectProfessional Competenceen
dc.subjectQuality of Health Careen
dc.subjectQuality of Lifeen
dc.subjectResource Allocationen
dc.subjectReviewen
dc.subjectRisken
dc.subjectSelection for Treatmenten
dc.subjectStandardsen
dc.subjectTreatment Outcomeen
dc.subjectValuesen
dc.titleThe Ethics of Practice Guidelinesen
dc.provenanceDigital citation created by the National Reference Center for Bioethics Literature at Georgetown University for the BIOETHICSLINE database, part of the Kennedy Institute of Ethics' Bioethics Information Retrieval Project funded by the United States National Library of Medicine.en
dc.provenanceDigital citation migrated from OpenText LiveLink Discovery Server database named NBIO hosted by the Bioethics Research Library to the DSpace collection BioethicsLine hosted by Georgetown University.en


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


Georgetown University Seal
©2009—2023 Bioethics Research Library
Box 571212 Washington DC 20057-1212
202.687.3885