The `more-Abortions' Objection to Fetal Tissue Transplantation
Journal of Medicine and Philosophy. 1998 Aug; 23(4): 411-427.
One common objection to fetal tissue transplantation (FTT) is that, if it were to become a standard form of treatment, it would encourage or entrench the practice of abortion. This claim is at least factually plausible, although it cannot be definitively established. However, even if true, it does not constitute a compelling ethical argument against FTT. The harm allegedly brought about by FTT, when assessed by widely accepted non-consequentialist criteria, has limited moral significance. Even if FTT would cause more abortions to be performed, and abortion is taken to be a serious moral wrong, this is not sufficient in itself to make FTT wrong.
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Gillam, Lynn (1998-08)
Gillam, Lynn (1997-10)In the debate over fetal tissue use, an analogy is often drawn between removing organs from the body of a person who has been murdered to use for transplantation, and collecting tissue from an aborted fetus to use for the ...
Gillam, Lynn (1997-10)