dc.creator | Weijer, Charles | en |
dc.creator | Singer, Peter A. | en |
dc.creator | Dickens, Bernard M. | en |
dc.creator | Workman, Stephen | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2015-05-05T19:09:05Z | en |
dc.date.available | 2015-05-05T19:09:05Z | en |
dc.date.created | 1998-10-06 | en |
dc.date.issued | 1998-10-06 | en |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | Canadian Medical Association Journal. 1998 Oct 6; 159(7):
817-821. | en |
dc.identifier.issn | 0008-4409 | en |
dc.identifier.uri | http://worldcatlibraries.org/registry/gateway?version=1.0&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&atitle=Bioethics+for+Clinicians:+16.+Dealing+with+Demands+for+Inappropriate+treatment&title=Canadian+Medical+Association+Journal.++&volume=159&issue=7&pages=817-821&date=1998&au=Weijer,+Charles | en |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10822/757728 | en |
dc.description.abstract | Demands by patients or their families for treatment thought to be
inappropriate by health care providers constitute an important set of moral
problems in clinical practice. A variety of approaches to such cases have been
described in the literature, including medical futility, standard of care and
negotiation. Medical futility fails because it confounds morally distinct
cases: demand for an ineffective treatment and demand for an effective
treatment that supports a controversial end (e.g., permanent unconsciousness).
Medical futility is not necessary in the first case and is harmful in the
second. Ineffective treatment falls outside the standard of care, and thus
health care workers have no obligation to provide it. Demands for treatment
that supports controversial ends are difficult cases best addressed through
open communication, negotiation and the use of conflict-resolution techniques.
Institutions should ensure that fair and unambiguous procedures for dealing
with such cases are laid out in policy statements. | en |
dc.format | Article | en |
dc.language | en | en |
dc.source | BRL:MEDKIE/99021847 | en |
dc.subject | Allowing to Die | en |
dc.subject | Bioethics | en |
dc.subject | Case Studies | en |
dc.subject | Communication | en |
dc.subject | Decision Making | en |
dc.subject | Dissent | en |
dc.subject | Evidence-Based Medicine | en |
dc.subject | Family Members | en |
dc.subject | Futility | en |
dc.subject | Health | en |
dc.subject | Health Care | en |
dc.subject | Legal Aspects | en |
dc.subject | Life | en |
dc.subject | Literature | en |
dc.subject | Mediation | en |
dc.subject | Medicine | en |
dc.subject | Patient Care | en |
dc.subject | Patients | en |
dc.subject | Persistent Vegetative State | en |
dc.subject | Physicians | en |
dc.subject | Prolongation of Life | en |
dc.subject | Refusal to Treat | en |
dc.subject | Resuscitation | en |
dc.subject | Resuscitation Orders | en |
dc.subject | Standards | en |
dc.subject | Terminally Ill | en |
dc.subject | Unconsciousness | en |
dc.subject | Values | en |
dc.subject | Withholding Treatment | en |
dc.title | Bioethics for Clinicians: 16. Dealing With Demands for Inappropriate Treatment | en |
dc.provenance | Digital citation created by the National Reference Center for Bioethics Literature at Georgetown University for the BIOETHICSLINE database, part of the Kennedy Institute of Ethics' Bioethics Information Retrieval Project funded by the United States National Library of Medicine. | en |
dc.provenance | Digital citation migrated from OpenText LiveLink Discovery Server database named NBIO hosted by the Bioethics Research Library to the DSpace collection BioethicsLine hosted by Georgetown University. | en |