Show simple item record

dc.creatorWeijer, Charlesen
dc.creatorSinger, Peter A.en
dc.creatorDickens, Bernard M.en
dc.creatorWorkman, Stephenen
dc.date.accessioned2015-05-05T19:09:05Zen
dc.date.available2015-05-05T19:09:05Zen
dc.date.created1998-10-06en
dc.date.issued1998-10-06en
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationCanadian Medical Association Journal. 1998 Oct 6; 159(7): 817-821.en
dc.identifier.issn0008-4409en
dc.identifier.urihttp://worldcatlibraries.org/registry/gateway?version=1.0&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&atitle=Bioethics+for+Clinicians:+16.+Dealing+with+Demands+for+Inappropriate+treatment&title=Canadian+Medical+Association+Journal.++&volume=159&issue=7&pages=817-821&date=1998&au=Weijer,+Charlesen
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10822/757728en
dc.description.abstractDemands by patients or their families for treatment thought to be inappropriate by health care providers constitute an important set of moral problems in clinical practice. A variety of approaches to such cases have been described in the literature, including medical futility, standard of care and negotiation. Medical futility fails because it confounds morally distinct cases: demand for an ineffective treatment and demand for an effective treatment that supports a controversial end (e.g., permanent unconsciousness). Medical futility is not necessary in the first case and is harmful in the second. Ineffective treatment falls outside the standard of care, and thus health care workers have no obligation to provide it. Demands for treatment that supports controversial ends are difficult cases best addressed through open communication, negotiation and the use of conflict-resolution techniques. Institutions should ensure that fair and unambiguous procedures for dealing with such cases are laid out in policy statements.en
dc.formatArticleen
dc.languageenen
dc.sourceBRL:MEDKIE/99021847en
dc.subjectAllowing to Dieen
dc.subjectBioethicsen
dc.subjectCase Studiesen
dc.subjectCommunicationen
dc.subjectDecision Makingen
dc.subjectDissenten
dc.subjectEvidence-Based Medicineen
dc.subjectFamily Membersen
dc.subjectFutilityen
dc.subjectHealthen
dc.subjectHealth Careen
dc.subjectLegal Aspectsen
dc.subjectLifeen
dc.subjectLiteratureen
dc.subjectMediationen
dc.subjectMedicineen
dc.subjectPatient Careen
dc.subjectPatientsen
dc.subjectPersistent Vegetative Stateen
dc.subjectPhysiciansen
dc.subjectProlongation of Lifeen
dc.subjectRefusal to Treaten
dc.subjectResuscitationen
dc.subjectResuscitation Ordersen
dc.subjectStandardsen
dc.subjectTerminally Illen
dc.subjectUnconsciousnessen
dc.subjectValuesen
dc.subjectWithholding Treatmenten
dc.titleBioethics for Clinicians: 16. Dealing With Demands for Inappropriate Treatmenten
dc.provenanceDigital citation created by the National Reference Center for Bioethics Literature at Georgetown University for the BIOETHICSLINE database, part of the Kennedy Institute of Ethics' Bioethics Information Retrieval Project funded by the United States National Library of Medicine.en
dc.provenanceDigital citation migrated from OpenText LiveLink Discovery Server database named NBIO hosted by the Bioethics Research Library to the DSpace collection BioethicsLine hosted by Georgetown University.en


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


Georgetown University Seal
©2009—2023 Bioethics Research Library
Box 571212 Washington DC 20057-1212
202.687.3885