Show simple item record

dc.creatorBeauchamp, Tom L.en
dc.date.accessioned2015-05-05T19:09:49Zen
dc.date.available2015-05-05T19:09:49Zen
dc.date.created1999-08en
dc.date.issued1999-08en
dc.identifier10.1076/jmep.24.4.322.5984en
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationJournal of Medicine and Philosophy. 1999 Aug; 24(4): 322-335.en
dc.identifier.issn0360-5310en
dc.identifier.urihttp://worldcatlibraries.org/registry/gateway?version=1.0&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&atitle=Hume+on+the+Nonhuman+Animal&title=Journal+of+Medicine+and+Philosophy.++&volume=24&issue=4&pages=322-335&date=1999&au=Beauchamp,+Tom+L.en
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1076/jmep.24.4.322.5984en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10822/757805en
dc.description.abstractHume wrote about fundamental similarities and dissimilarities between human and nonhuman animals. His work was centered on the cognitive and emotional lives of animals, rather than their moral or legal standing, but his theories have implications for issues of moral standing. The historical background of these controversies reaches to ancient philosophy and to several prominent figures in early modern philosophy. Hume develops several of the themes in this literature. His underlying method is analogical argument and his conclusions are generally favorable regarding the abilities in animals. Hume does not attribute a moral sense or capacity of judgment to animals, but he does suggest that their actions exhibit moral qualities, such as other-regarding instincts. Hume allows in-kind differences in both demonstrative reason and moral judgment, but in the domains of both causal reason and moral agency he believes there are differences of degree rather than of kind. Hume's most significant philosophical contribution was to move as far as anyone before him to a naturalistic explanation of human and nonhuman minds that invited psychological and epistemological examination of minds by using the identical methods and categories for man and beast.en
dc.formatArticleen
dc.languageenen
dc.sourceBRL:MEDKIE/99444884en
dc.subjectAnimal Experimentationen
dc.subjectAnimal Rightsen
dc.subjectEmotionsen
dc.subjectHistorical Aspectsen
dc.subjectHuman Characteristicsen
dc.subjectIntelligenceen
dc.subjectLiteratureen
dc.subjectMethodsen
dc.subjectMoral Policyen
dc.subjectPhilosophyen
dc.subjectRightsen
dc.subjectSpeciesismen
dc.titleHume on the Nonhuman Animalen
dc.provenanceDigital citation created by the National Reference Center for Bioethics Literature at Georgetown University for the BIOETHICSLINE database, part of the Kennedy Institute of Ethics' Bioethics Information Retrieval Project funded by the United States National Library of Medicine.en
dc.provenanceDigital citation migrated from OpenText LiveLink Discovery Server database named NBIO hosted by the Bioethics Research Library to the DSpace collection BioethicsLine hosted by Georgetown University.en


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


Georgetown University Seal
©2009—2019 Bioethics Research Library
Box 571212 Washington DC 20057-1212
202.687.3885