Assisted Suicide Compared With Refusal of Treatment: A Valid Distinction?
Miller, Franklin G.
Fins, Joseph J.
Annals of Internal Medicine. 2000 Mar 21; 132(6): 470-475.
The continuing debate over the deeply controversial issue of physician-assisted suicide has been complicated by confusion about how this practice resembles or differs from refusal of life-sustaining treatment. Perspectives on ethics and policy hinge on the contested issue of whether a valid distinction can be made between assisted suicide and withdrawal of treatment. This paper uses three illustrative cases to examine leading arguments for and against the recognition of a fundamental distinction between these practices. The first case involves assisted suicide by ingestion of prescribed barbiturates, the second involves withdrawal of artificial nutrition and hydration, and the third involves a decision to stop eating and drinking. On theoretical and practical grounds, this paper defends the position that there is a valid distinction between assisted suicide and refusal of treatment.
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Miller, Franklin G.; Fins, Joseph J.; Snyder, Lois (2000-03-21)
Caplan, Arthur L.; Snyder, Lois; Faber-Langendoen, Kathy (2000-03-21)Oregon has legalized and implemented physician-assisted suicide, while observers argue about the moral import of attempting to formulate guidelines; the utility any set of guidelines can have for physician practice, health ...
Snyder, Lois; Caplan, Arthur L. (2000-03-21)