Allowing and Assisting Patients to Die: The Perspectives of Oncology Practitioners
Pierce, Susan F.
Journal of Advanced Nursing. 1999 Sep; 30(3): 616-622.
The moral distinctions between prolonging life, allowing for a dignified death, and assisting patients to die (hastening death) are troublesome to health practitioners. On 26 June 1997 the United States Supreme Court ruled that individuals do not have a constitutional right to physician-assisted suicide, but that individual states can legislate their preferences. Given this ruling it becomes important to ascertain the opinions of practitioners caring for persons who are at the end of their life. The data from interviews with 11 nurses and 10 physicians, who practice in the field of oncology, revealed issues associated with the care of dying persons. How health professionals integrated their perspectives of science/data with their perspectives on persons and personal goals affected the vigour with which they would institute treatment for the terminal patient. Further, ethical uncertainty dominated the decision making of all participants in this study when they were confronted with the question of assisting/hastening patients' dying.
Advance Directives; Allowing to Die; Artificial Feeding; Assisted Suicide; Attitudes; Cancer; Caring; Comparative Studies; Death; Decision Making; Drugs; Euthanasia; Goals; Health; Interviews; Knowledge; Life; Nurses; Opioid Analgesics; Palliative Care; Patients; Physicians; Prolongation of Life; Science; Suffering; Suicide; Survey; Terminal Care; Terminally Ill; Uncertainty; Voluntary Euthanasia; Withholding Treatment;
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
General Practitioners' Perspectives Regarding Competence and Confidentiality in an Adolescent With Suspected Anorexia Nervosa: Legal and Ethical Considerations Bartholomew, Terence P.; Paxton, Susan J. (2003-02)
Steinberg, M.A.; Parker, C.M.; Cartwright, C.M.; MacDonald, F.J.; Del Mar, C.B.; Williams, G.M.; and Hoffenberg, R. (1996-07)