The Morality of Abortion and the Deprivation of Futures
Brown, Mark T.
Journal of Medical Ethics. 2000 Apr; 26(2): 103-107.
In an influential essay entitled Why abortion is wrong, Donald Marquis argues that killing actual persons is wrong because it unjustly deprives victims of their future; that the fetus has a future similar in morally relevant respects to the future lost by competent adult homicide victims, and that, as consequence, abortion is justifiable only in the same circumstances in which killing competent adult human beings is justifiable. The metaphysical claim implicit in the first premise, that actual persons have a future of value, is ambiguous. The Future Like Ours argument (FLO) would be valid if "future of value" were used consistently to mean either "potential future of value" or "self-represented future of value", and FLO would be sound if one or the other interpretation supported both the moral claim and the metaphysical claim, but if, as I argue, any interpretation which makes the argument valid renders it unsound, then FLO must be rejected. Its apparent strength derives from equivocation on the concept of "a future of value".
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Poe v. Gerstein: Constitutional Right of Privacy -- Minor's Right to an Abortion -- Statutory Requirement of Spousal Consent, or Parental Consent in the Case of an Unmarried, Minor Female, Is a Unconstitutional Deprivation of a Woman's Right To Determine Whether to Undergo an Abortion Sanders, Arthur David (1976-12)
Shah, Ajit; Pennington, Mark; Heginbotham, Chris; Donaldson, Cam (2011-09)The Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS), introduced into the Mental Capacity Act 2005, were fully implemented on 1 April 2009 in England and Wales. The government estimated 20,000 assessments for DoLS at a cost of ...