dc.creator | Van der Wilt, Gert Jan | en |
dc.creator | Reuzel, Rob | en |
dc.creator | Banta, H. David | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2015-05-05T19:12:16Z | en |
dc.date.available | 2015-05-05T19:12:16Z | en |
dc.date.created | 2000-01 | en |
dc.date.issued | 2000-01 | en |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics. 2000 Jan; 21(1): 103-115. | en |
dc.identifier.issn | 1386-7415 | en |
dc.identifier.uri | http://worldcatlibraries.org/registry/gateway?version=1.0&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&atitle=The+Ethics+of+Assessing+Health+Technologies&title=Theoretical+Medicine+and+Bioethics.++&volume=21&issue=1&pages=103-115&date=2000&au=Van+der+Wilt,+Gert+Jan | en |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10822/760141 | en |
dc.description.abstract | Health technology assessment (HTA) consists of the systematic study
of the consequences of the introduction or continued use of the technology in
a particular context, with the explicit objective to arrive at a judgment of
the value or merit of the technology. Ideally, it is aimed at assessing all
aspects of a given technology or group of technologies, including
non-technical, e.g. socio-ethical, aspects. However, methods for assessing
socio-ethical implications of health technology are relatively undeveloped and
few mechanisms exist to take action based on the results of such evaluations.
Still, the examples of cochlear inplants (CI) and other cases illustrate that
HTA is not a matter of merely collecting the facts about a technology. The
facts must be plausible and relevant from a particular framework, which is not
always shared by different groups. It is here that socio-ethical aspects are
encountered. If health technology assessment aims to enhance the
accountability of the decision making process regarding funding and use of
health technology, it is a major challenge to assessors of health technologies
to deal adequately with existing value pluralism. In this respect interactive
evaluation may have something to offer. | en |
dc.format | Article | en |
dc.language | en | en |
dc.source | BRL:MEDKIE/20383106 | en |
dc.subject | Accountability | en |
dc.subject | Beneficence | en |
dc.subject | Biomedical Technologies | en |
dc.subject | Children | en |
dc.subject | Cochlear Implants | en |
dc.subject | Cultural Pluralism | en |
dc.subject | Decision Making | en |
dc.subject | Ethics | en |
dc.subject | Evaluation | en |
dc.subject | Health | en |
dc.subject | Hearing Disorders | en |
dc.subject | Life | en |
dc.subject | Methods | en |
dc.subject | Patient Participation | en |
dc.subject | Quality of Life | en |
dc.subject | Risks and Benefits | en |
dc.subject | Technology | en |
dc.subject | Technology Assessment | en |
dc.subject | Treatment Outcome | en |
dc.subject | Values | en |
dc.title | The Ethics of Assessing Health Technologies | en |
dc.provenance | Digital citation created by the National Reference Center for Bioethics Literature at Georgetown University for the BIOETHICSLINE database, part of the Kennedy Institute of Ethics' Bioethics Information Retrieval Project funded by the United States National Library of Medicine. | en |
dc.provenance | Digital citation migrated from OpenText LiveLink Discovery Server database named NBIO hosted by the Bioethics Research Library to the DSpace collection BioethicsLine hosted by Georgetown University. | en |