Georgetown University LogoGeorgetown University Library LogoDigitalGeorgetown Home
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   DigitalGeorgetown Home
    • Georgetown Law Library
    • Research Materials
    • DC Historic Preservation Law
    • Mayor's Agent Decisions
    • View Item
    •   DigitalGeorgetown Home
    • Georgetown Law Library
    • Research Materials
    • DC Historic Preservation Law
    • Mayor's Agent Decisions
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    HPA No. 1986-219 (In re. Connecticut and R Street Associates building)

    • HPA Number: 1986-219
    • Case Name: In re 1710 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Square 92, Lot 59, Applicant, Connecticut and R Street Associates
    • Location of Property: 1710 Connecticut Avenue, N.W.
    • Date of Decision: 3/14/1989
    • Type of Case/Type of Permit Sought: Application for a permit for demolition
    • Disposition: Demolition permit issued

    Summary of Decision:

    Connecticut and R Street Associates (“Applicant”) sought a permit to demolish the rear portion of 1710 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., a Victorian structure that is considered a contributing building in the DuPont Circle Historic District. According to the Applicant’s plans, the front facade and the first twenty-five feet of the building would remain intact. The Historic Preservation Review Board (“Review Board”) adopted the Review Board’s Staff Report and Recommendation, which approved the partial demolition based on the Applicant’s plan to retain the building’s facade. The Mayor’s Agent accepted the Review Board’s recommendation and approved the issuance of the permit for partial demolition based on the conclusion that such demolition was “consistent with the purposes of Section 2(b) of the Act.”

    Consistent with the Purposes of the Act:

    The Mayor’s Agent found that the additions to the rear of 1710 Connecticut Avenue, N.W. were in “poor condition and are inconsistent with the historic character of the rest of the structure,” and concluded that demolition of same was thus consistent with the purposes of the Act. The Mayor’s Agent also cited that there was no opposition to the partial demolition.

    Facades:

    The Staff Report which was adopted by the Review Board stated that the facade would be retained, and that retention of facades is “part of a scheme which has been generally approved” by the Review Board.

    -----

    Files in this item

    Cover for HPA No. 1986-219 (In re. Connecticut and R Street Associates building)
    Name:
    Full text of order.pdf
    Size:
    25.kB
    Format:
    PDF
    View/Open
    Bookview
    Creator
    Government of the District of Columbia. Department of Consumer and Regulatory Affairs
    Permanent Link
    http://hdl.handle.net/10822/760303
    Date
    1986
    Subject
    Demolition; Consistent with Purposes of the Act; Facade;
    Type
    Record (document)
    Collections
    • Mayor's Agent Decisions
    Metadata
    Show full item record

    Related items

    Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.

    • Cover for District Intown Props. v. D.C. Dep't of Consumer & Regulatory Affairs

      District Intown Props. v. D.C. Dep't of Consumer & Regulatory Affairs 

      United States District Court for the District of Columbia (1998-09-25)
    Related Items in Google Scholar

    Georgetown University Seal
    ©2023 Georgetown Law Library
    111 G. Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20001
    202.662.9131
    https://www.law.georgetown.edu/library/
     

     

    Browse

    All of DigitalGeorgetownCommunities & CollectionsCreatorsTitlesBy Creation DateThis CollectionCreatorsTitlesBy Creation Date

    My Account

    Login

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    Georgetown University Seal
    ©2023 Georgetown Law Library
    111 G. Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20001
    202.662.9131
    https://www.law.georgetown.edu/library/