Georgetown University LogoGeorgetown University Library LogoDigitalGeorgetown Home
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   DigitalGeorgetown Home
    • Georgetown University Institutional Repository
    • School of Continuing Studies
    • Liberal Studies
    • Liberal Studies Theses and Dissertations
    • View Item
    •   DigitalGeorgetown Home
    • Georgetown University Institutional Repository
    • School of Continuing Studies
    • Liberal Studies
    • Liberal Studies Theses and Dissertations
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    The Military Imperative for the Liberal Arts

    Cover for The Military Imperative for the Liberal Arts
    View/Open
    View/Open: KaufmannJr_georgetown_0076D_12853.pdf (1.3MB) Bookview

    Creator
    Kaufmann, Joseph Gregory, Jr
    Advisor
    Collins, Michael J
    Abstract
    After more than a decade of war involving close and often personal interaction with people of other cultures, beliefs, and customs, the Army is once again turning its attention to the need to re-establish its competence and capacity for conventional, force-on-force combat. As seen in past historical patterns of post-conflict reorientation, the Army is trumpeting its high technology edge and its anticipation of future high technology advances. Unfortunately, as captured in public statements and regulatory guidance, the Army concurrently champions an undergraduate education in the science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) disciplines for its future leaders in the precommissioning phase of professional military education (PME). However, that endorsement of a STEM education stands in direct opposition to the leadership narrative that emerges through close textual reading and analysis of the many publications addressing leadership and leader preparation. This narrative clearly emphasizes outcomes that can only be met through a broad-based education best accomplished through a liberal arts education.
     
    The national security establishment is a massive bureaucracy. Unsurprisingly, it publishes thousands of documents that serve to direct, guide, or suggest actions to the armed services in the execution of their duties. Starting with the National Security Strategy published by the White House, and following the cascading narrative thread through the various textual levels of the establishment--Congress, Department of Defense, Joint Chiefs of Staff, and ending in this case with the U.S. Army--a distinct and ever-more specific discussion of leader expectations, knowledge, attributes, and competencies are identified. With specific attention to the Army, this textual narrative thread belies the public statements supporting STEM education.
     
    Unsurprisingly, given the massive amount of written texts, contradictions arise. However, this particular contradiction carries implications beyond the normal. When the future officer graduates from college and is commissioned as a new second lieutenant, he or she immediately assumes responsibility for soldiers assigned to his or her platoon and for leading them across a full range of missions from direct combat to post-conflict stability operations in a foreign location surrounded by indigenous populations to defense support to civilian authorities within the United States. The human complexity of the lieutenant's responsibilities argues for the liberal arts as the optimum precommissioning education for the future officer.
     
    Using literature as its primary example, the thesis argues that a liberal arts education is the best means of producing the leaders that the Army itself has described in its own literature as ideal. The argument is made through first person teaching examples, a literary theory of how literature study supports the learner, examination of recent, empirical research on the role of reading fiction and need for cognitive closure, and recent work on the multi-faceted cognition of the integrative thinker. Consequently, the close alignment of these outcomes with the textually defined leadership model will support the conclusion that a liberal arts education is the more appropriate and helpful undergraduate education during the precommissioning PME.
     
    Description
    D.L.S.
    Permanent Link
    http://hdl.handle.net/10822/760887
    Date Published
    2015
    Subject
    leader development; leadership; liberal arts; military doctrine; professional military education; STEM; Military art and science; Education, Higher; Management; Military studies; Higher education; Management;
    Type
    thesis
    Embargo Lift Date
    2017-04-09
    Publisher
    Georgetown University
    Extent
    211 leaves
    Collections
    • Liberal Studies Theses and Dissertations
    Metadata
    Show full item record

    Related items

    Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.

    • Thumbnail

      The Evolution-Creation Controversy: Opinions From Students at a "Liberal" Liberal Arts College 

      Zimmerman, Michael (1986)
    Related Items in Google Scholar

    Georgetown University Seal
    ©2009 - 2023 Georgetown University Library
    37th & O Streets NW
    Washington DC 20057-1174
    202.687.7385
    digitalscholarship@georgetown.edu
    Accessibility
     

     

    Browse

    All of DigitalGeorgetownCommunities & CollectionsCreatorsTitlesBy Creation DateThis CollectionCreatorsTitlesBy Creation Date

    My Account

    Login

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    Georgetown University Seal
    ©2009 - 2023 Georgetown University Library
    37th & O Streets NW
    Washington DC 20057-1174
    202.687.7385
    digitalscholarship@georgetown.edu
    Accessibility