Georgetown University LogoGeorgetown University Library LogoDigitalGeorgetown Home
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   DigitalGeorgetown Home
    • Georgetown Law Library
    • Research Materials
    • DC Historic Preservation Law
    • Mayor's Agent Decisions
    • View Item
    •   DigitalGeorgetown Home
    • Georgetown Law Library
    • Research Materials
    • DC Historic Preservation Law
    • Mayor's Agent Decisions
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    HPA No. 1998-186 (In re. Hillandale Mansion)

    • HPA Number: 1998-186
    • Building Name: Hillandale Mansion
    • Address: 3905 Mansion St. NW
    • Date of Order: 11-Jun-98

    Summary:

    Applicants sought a permit to subdivide the lot encompassing the landmark Hillandale Mansion into two lots to allow the mansion to be used as two single-family, semi-detached homes. Nothing the failure of all attempts to market the mansion over the previous 18 years, the Mayor's Agent concluded that the proposed subdivision would accommodate the restoration and renovation of the landmark, and was therefore consistent with the purposes of the Act.

    Consistent with the Purposes of the Act:

    Subdivision of the lot encompassing the landmark Hillandale was found to be consistent with the purposes of the Act. Dividing the mansion into two residences was found to be the only economically feasible way to restore the landmark and readapt it for current residential use, as demonstrated by the Applicants inability to market the property as a single-family residence over the past eighteen years.

    Economic Feasibility:

    The Mayor's Agent concluded that Applicants satisfactorily demonstrated that the use of the landmark Hillandale Mansion as a single-family residence was economically infeasible. Several unsuccessful attempts had been made to market it as such over the past eighteen years, leading the Applicants to propose dividing the mansion into two residences.

    Subdivision:

    Subdivision of the lot encompassing the landmark Hillandale was found to be consistent with the purposes of the Act. Dividing the mansion into two residences was found to be the only economically feasible way to restore the landmark and readapt it for current residential use, as demonstrated by the Applicants inability to market the property as a single-family residence over the past eighteen years.

    -----

    Files in this item

    Cover for HPA No. 1998-186 (In re. Hillandale Mansion)
    Name:
    Full text of order.pdf
    Size:
    28.kB
    Format:
    PDF
    View/Open
    Bookview
    Creator
    Government of the District of Columbia. Department of Consumer and Regulatory Affairs. Office of Adjudication
    Permanent Link
    http://hdl.handle.net/10822/761254
    Date
    1998
    Subject
    Subdivision; Consistent with Purposes of the Act; Economic Feasibility;
    Type
    Record (document)
    Extent
    1 pdf
    Collections
    • Mayor's Agent Decisions
    Metadata
    Show full item record

    Related items

    Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.

    • Cover for District Intown Props. v. D.C. Dep't of Consumer & Regulatory Affairs

      District Intown Props. v. D.C. Dep't of Consumer & Regulatory Affairs 

      United States District Court for the District of Columbia (1998-09-25)
    Related Items in Google Scholar

    Georgetown University Seal
    ©2023 Georgetown Law Library
    111 G. Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20001
    202.662.9131
    https://www.law.georgetown.edu/library/
     

     

    Browse

    All of DigitalGeorgetownCommunities & CollectionsCreatorsTitlesBy Creation DateThis CollectionCreatorsTitlesBy Creation Date

    My Account

    Login

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    Georgetown University Seal
    ©2023 Georgetown Law Library
    111 G. Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20001
    202.662.9131
    https://www.law.georgetown.edu/library/