Assessing Peer Review for Research
Davis, Robert H.
Gibley, Charles W.
Journal of the American Podiatry Association 1981 April; 71(4): 224-229
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Holcomb, John B; Weiskopf, Richard; Champion, Howard; Gould, Steven A; Sauer, R Michelle; Brasel, Karen; Bochicchio, Grant; Bulger, Eileen; Cotton, Bryan A; Davis, Daniel; Dutton, Richard; Hauser, Carl J; Hess, John R; Hides, George A; Knudson, Paula; MacKenzie, Ellen; McGinnis, Robert L; Michalek, Joel; Moore, Frederick A; Omert, Laurel; Pollock, Brad H; Tortella, Bartholomew; Sugarman, Jeremy; Schreiber, Martin A; Wade, Charles E (2011-02)Selection of study endpoints is one of the most important decisions in the design of effective clinical trials. Late mortality (e.g., 28 days) is an unambiguous endpoint, accepted by regulatory agencies, but it is viewed ...
Inadequate Reporting of Research Ethics Review and Informed Consent in Cluster Randomised Trials: Review of Random Sample of Published Trials Taljaard, Monica; McRae, Andrew D; Weijer, Charles; Bennett, Carol; Dixon, Stephanie; Taleban, Julia; Skea, Zoe; Eccles, Martin P; Brehaut, Jamie C; Donner, Allan; Saginur, Raphael; Boruch, Robert F; Grimshaw, Jeremy M (2011-05-11)To investigate the extent to which authors of cluster randomised trials adhered to two basic requirements of the World Medical Association's Declaration of Helsinki and the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors' ...