Show simple item record

dc.date.accessioned2016-01-08T18:50:55Zen
dc.date.available2016-01-08T18:50:55Zen
dc.date.created1982-12-21en
dc.date.issued1982-12-21en
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationPacific Reporter; 2d Series; 656: 293-300en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10822/796143en
dc.formatCourt Decisionen
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherOregon. Supreme Courten
dc.sourceeweb:44216en
dc.subjectLaboratoriesen
dc.subject.classificationInformed Consent (Bills, Laws, and Cases)en
dc.titleOksenholt v. Lederle Laboratoriesen
dc.provenanceCitation prepared by the Library and Information Services group of the Kennedy Institute of Ethics, Georgetown University for the ETHXWeb database.en
dc.provenanceCitation migrated from OpenText LiveLink Discovery Server database named EWEB hosted by the Bioethics Research Library to the DSpace collection EthxWeb hosted by DigitalGeorgetown.en


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


Georgetown University Seal
©2009—2023 Bioethics Research Library
Box 571212 Washington DC 20057-1212
202.687.3885