Interfering With Nature
Journal of Applied Philosophy 1996; 13(1): 1-11
Certain kinds of medical treatment are often held to be morally unacceptable because they are an `interference with nature'. I suggest a way in which we can make sense of such ideas. We can make significant choices only against a background of conditions which we regard as `natural', and these will typically include such facts as those of birth and death, of youth and age, and of sexual relations. I argue, however, that such ideas, though intelligible, do not establish any valid moral objection to, for instance, the use of ovarian tissue for assisted conception.
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
21st Bethesda Conference: Ethics in Cardiovascular Medicine, Oct 5-6, 1989. Task Force III: Perspectives on the Allocation of Limited Resources in Cardiovascular Medicine Ryan, Thomas J.; Graham, Thomas P.; Annas, George J.; DeMaria, Anthony N.; Fost, Norman C.; Fuster, Valentin; Harvey, John Collins; Levinsky, Norman G.; McCullough, Laurence B.; Rettig, Richard A.; Schwartz, William J.; Sundwall, David N.; Talner, Norman S.; Wigle, E. Douglas; Willman, Vallee L. (1990-07)