De Facto Gatekeeping and Informed Consent in Intensive Care
Creator
Burrows, R.C.
Hodgson, R.E.
Bibliographic Citation
Medicine and Law: World Association for Medical Law 1997; 16(1): 17-27
Abstract
Medical decision-making is based on the doctrine of informed consent which is, in turn, based on autonomy, which represents one of four pillars of medical ethics, the others being beneficence, non-malfeasance and social justice. Decision-making in intensive care with respect to the withdrawal of treatment, in particular ventilator therapy, is often extremely difficult for patients or their relatives and they would rather not make any decision other than to insist on the maintenance of therapy in spite of sound, reasonable medical advice that such therapy is of no value to the patient. Aside from issues of a dignified death, this is likely to be to the detriment of other patients who might be refused admission to intensive care and thus is counter to the dictates of social justice. Under these circumstances, there would appear to be a need to give authority to the reasonable medical decision to discontinue resuscitation.
Permanent Link
Find in a Library.http://hdl.handle.net/10822/899832
Date
1997Collections
Metadata
Show full item recordRelated items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Informed Consent for Research Purposes in Intensive Care Patients in Europe-Part II. an Official Statement of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine
Lemaire, F.; Blanch, L.; Cohen, S.L. (European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Working Group on Ethics, 1997-04)