Case Study 2-10: Induced Labor Versus Spontaneous Labor and Delivery

dc.creator	Mahowald, Mary B.	en
dc.date.accessioned	2016-01-08T21:19:26Z	en
dc.date.available	2016-01-08T21:19:26Z	en
dc.date.created	1997	en
dc.date.issued	1997	en
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation	In: LOSS DURING PREGNANCY OR IN THE NEWBORN PERIOD, edited by J. R. Woods and J. L. Woods. Pitman, NJ: Jannetti Publications, Inc., 1997. pp. 343-346	en
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10822/899934	en
dc.format	Book Chapter	en
dc.language	en	en
dc.source	eweb:171294	en
dc.subject.classification	Reproduction / Reproductive Technologies	en
dc.subject.classification	Death and Dying	en
dc.subject.classification	Health Care Programs for Women	en
dc.subject.classification	Health Care for Embryos and Fetuses	en
dc.title	Case Study 2-10: Induced Labor Versus Spontaneous Labor and Delivery	en
dc.provenance	Citation prepared by the Library and Information Services group of the Kennedy Institute of Ethics, Georgetown University for the ETHXWeb database.	en
dc.provenance	Citation migrated from OpenText LiveLink Discovery Server database named EWEB hosted by the Bioethics Research Library to the DSpace collection EthxWeb hosted by DigitalGeorgetown.	en

Related items