Show simple item record
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationWest's South Eastern Reporter, 2d Series, 1998; 498: 268-274en
dc.description.abstractCourt Decision: 498 South Eastern Reporter, 2d Series 268; 1998 May 4 (date of decision). The Supreme Court of Georgia held that a state statute permitting a crime victim who is significantly exposed to HIV to request an HIV blood test on the person charged with the crime and arrested does not violate the Fourth Amendment right against unreasonable searches, nor does it violate privacy or equal protection rights. Malik Adams attacked and struggled with police officers during arrest. In the struggle, Adams's and an officer's hands, on which there were bleeding wounds, came in contact. Even though Adams did not have any outward AIDS symptoms, the state filed a motion to compel HIV testing. The Supreme Court of Georgia held that, because the statute compelling HIV testing serves the compelling state interest of preventing the public's exposure to HIV, the search, in this case the taking and sampling of blood, is reasonable. [KIE/INW]en
dc.formatCourt Decisionen
dc.publisherGeorgia. Supreme Courten
dc.subjectEqual Protectionen
dc.subjectState Interesten
dc.subject.classificationGovernment Ethicsen
dc.subject.classificationRight to Refuse Treatmenten
dc.subject.classificationAcquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome or HIV Infectionen
dc.titleAdams v. Stateen
dc.provenanceCitation prepared by the Library and Information Services group of the Kennedy Institute of Ethics, Georgetown University for the ETHXWeb database.en
dc.provenanceCitation migrated from OpenText LiveLink Discovery Server database named EWEB hosted by the Bioethics Research Library to the DSpace collection EthxWeb hosted by DigitalGeorgetown.en

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Georgetown University Seal
©2009—2019 Bioethics Research Library
Box 571212 Washington DC 20057-1212