Can Unequal Be More Fair? Ethics, Subject Allocation, and Randomised Clinical Trials
Avins, Andrew L.
Journal of Medical Ethics 1998 December; 24(6): 401-408
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Avins, Andrew L. (1998-12)Randomised clinical trials provide the most valid means of establishing the efficacy of clinical therapeutics. Ethical standards dictate that patients and clinicians should not consent to randomisation unless there is ...
Inadequate Reporting of Research Ethics Review and Informed Consent in Cluster Randomised Trials: Review of Random Sample of Published Trials Taljaard, Monica; McRae, Andrew D; Weijer, Charles; Bennett, Carol; Dixon, Stephanie; Taleban, Julia; Skea, Zoe; Eccles, Martin P; Brehaut, Jamie C; Donner, Allan; Saginur, Raphael; Boruch, Robert F; Grimshaw, Jeremy M (2011-05-11)To investigate the extent to which authors of cluster randomised trials adhered to two basic requirements of the World Medical Association's Declaration of Helsinki and the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors' ...
Edwards, Sarah J.L.; Braunholtz, David A. (2000-06)In this paper, we respond to Andrew Avins' recent review of methods whose use he advocates in clinical trials, to make them more ethical. He recommends in particular, "unbalanced randomisation." However, we argue that, before ...