Show simple item record
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationFederal Reporter, 3d Series 1999; 192: 794-798en
dc.description.abstractCourt Decision: The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eight Circuit agreed with a lower court that had found Arkansas's Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of 1997 to be unconstitutionally overbroad and had permanently enjoined enforcement of the Act. The Act had made it a crime to perform "an abortion in which the person performing the abortion partially vaginally delivers a living fetus before taking the life of the fetus and completing the delivery." Physicians who perform abortions had challenged the constitutionality of the Act. Although the state had intended to ban only the dilation and extraction (D & X) procedure, the Act implicitly banned common procedures such as suction-curettage and dilation and evacuation (D & E). Because the law banned commonly accepted abortion procedures, the Court of Appeals concluded that Arkansas's Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act created an undue burden on the rights of women who seek a second-trimester abortion for a nonviable fetus.en
dc.formatCourt Decisionen
dc.publisherUnited States. Court of Appeals. Eighth Circuiten
dc.subjectFamily Planningen
dc.subjectPartial-Birth Rightsen
dc.subject.classificationLegal Interests of Health Personnel or Abortionen
dc.subject.classificationAbortion (Bills, Laws, and Cases)en
dc.titleLittle Rock Family Planning Services v. Jegleyen
dc.provenanceCitation prepared by the Library and Information Services group of the Kennedy Institute of Ethics, Georgetown University for the ETHXWeb database.en
dc.provenanceCitation migrated from OpenText LiveLink Discovery Server database named EWEB hosted by the Bioethics Research Library to the DSpace collection EthxWeb hosted by DigitalGeorgetown.en

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Georgetown University Seal
©2009—2023 Bioethics Research Library
Box 571212 Washington DC 20057-1212