Show simple item record

dc.creatorBuelow, W. E.en
dc.date.accessioned2016-01-08T21:44:47Zen
dc.date.available2016-01-08T21:44:47Zen
dc.date.created1999-12en
dc.date.issued1999-12en
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationTemple Law Review 1998 Winter; 71(4): 963-993en
dc.identifier.urihttp://worldcatlibraries.org/registry/gateway?version=1.0&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&atitle=To+Be+and+Not+to+Be:+Inconsistencies+in+the+Law+Regarding+the+Legal+Status+of+the+Unborn+Fetus&title=Temple+Law+Review+&volume=71&issue=4&spage=963-993&date=1999-12&au=Buelow,+W.+E.en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10822/929129en
dc.formatArticleen
dc.languageenen
dc.sourceeweb:209529en
dc.subjectLawen
dc.subject.classificationValue / Quality of Lifeen
dc.subject.classificationLegal Interests of Woman, Father, Fetus or Abortionen
dc.titleTo Be and Not to Be: Inconsistencies in the Law Regarding the Legal Status of the Unborn Fetusen
dc.provenanceCitation prepared by the Library and Information Services group of the Kennedy Institute of Ethics, Georgetown University for the ETHXWeb database.en
dc.provenanceCitation migrated from OpenText LiveLink Discovery Server database named EWEB hosted by the Bioethics Research Library to the DSpace collection EthxWeb hosted by DigitalGeorgetown.en


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


Georgetown University Seal
©2009—2019 Bioethics Research Library
Box 571212 Washington DC 20057-1212
202.687.3885