Can Unequal Be More Fair? A Response to Andrew Avins
Edwards, Sarah J.L.
Braunholtz, David A.
Journal of Medical Ethics 2000 June; 26(3): 179-182
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Edwards, Sarah J.L.; Braunholtz, David A. (2000-06)In this paper, we respond to Andrew Avins' recent review of methods whose use he advocates in clinical trials, to make them more ethical. He recommends in particular, "unbalanced randomisation." However, we argue that, before ...
Avins, Andrew L. (1998-12)Randomised clinical trials provide the most valid means of establishing the efficacy of clinical therapeutics. Ethical standards dictate that patients and clinicians should not consent to randomisation unless there is ...