Patient Autonomy for the Management of Chronic Conditions: A Two-Component Re-Conceptualization
Naik, Aanand D.
Dyer, Carmel B.
Kunik, Mark E.
McCullough, Laurence B.
American Journal of Bioethics 2009 February; 9(2): 23-30
The clinical application of the concept of patient autonomy has centered on the ability to deliberate and make treatment decisions (decisional autonomy) to the virtual exclusion of the capacity to execute the treatment plan (executive autonomy). However, the one-component concept of autonomy is problematic in the context of multiple chronic conditions. Adherence to complex treatments commonly breaks down when patients have functional, educational, and cognitive barriers that impair their capacity to plan, sequence, and carry out tasks associated with chronic care. The purpose of this article is to call for a two-component re-conceptualization of autonomy and to argue that the clinical assessment of capacity for patients with chronic conditions should be expanded to include both autonomous decision-making and autonomous execution of the agreed-upon treatment plan. We explain how the concept of autonomy should be expanded to include both decisional and executive autonomy, describe the biopsychosocial correlates of the two-component concept of autonomy, and recommend diagnostic and treatment strategies to support patients with deficits in executive autonomy.
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Workman, Richard H., Jr.; McCullough, Laurence B.; Molinari, Victor; Kunik, Mark; Orengo, Claudia; Khalsa, Devi Kirin; Rezabek, Pamela (2000-03)