Do Research Ethics Committees Identify Process Errors in Applications for Ethical Approval?
Journal of Medical Ethics 2009 February; 35(2): 130-132
We analysed research ethics committee (REC) letters. We found that RECs frequently identify process errors in applications from researchers that are not deemed "favourable" at first review. Errors include procedural violations (identified in 74% of all applications), missing information (68%), slip-ups (44%) and discrepancies (25%). Important questions arise about why the level of error identified by RECs is so high, and about how errors of different types should be handled.
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Angell, E; Biggs, H; Gahleitner, F; Dixon-Woods, M (2010-11)To identify issues raised by research ethics committees (RECs) in letters about applications to conduct research involving children.
Dixon-Woods, Mary; Angell, Emma; Tarrant, Carolyn; Thomas, Anne (2008-08)
Research Involving Adults Who Lack Capacity: How Have Research Ethics Committees Interpreted the Requirements? Dixon-Woods, Mary; Angell, E.L. (2009-06)Two separate regulatory regimes govern research with adults who lack capacity to consent in England and Wales: the Mental Capacity Act (MCA) 2005 and the Medicines for Human Use (Clinical Trials) Regulations 2004 ("the ...