Rethinking Radical Politics in the Context of Assisted Reproductive Technology
Bioethics 2009 January; 23(1): 20-27
Radical feminists have argued for both the radical potential of assisted reproductive technology (ART) and its oppressive and damaging effects for women. This paper will address the question of what constitutes a radical feminist position on ART; I will argue that the very debate over whether ART liberates or oppresses women is misguided, and that instead the issue should be understood dialectically. Reproductive technologies are neither inherently liberating nor entirely oppressive: we can only understand the potential and effects by considering how they are actually taken up within a culture. The internal contradictions, tensions, and inconsistencies within ART and the way it is addressed within the law points to a dialectic that resists a simple reductivist understanding.
Permanent LinkFind in a Library
Full Text from Publisher
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Parks, Jennifer A. (1996-04-15)Although reproductive technologies have been aimed at young, infertile women, evidence suggests that postmenopausal women are also taking advantage of them. Dr. Eike-Henner Kluge asserts in an article in CMAJ (1994; 151; ...
Parks, Jennifer A. (1996-04-15)
Cook, Jocelynn L; Collins, John; Buckett, William; Racowsky, Catherine; Hughes, Edward; Jarvi, Keith (2011-02)It has been well-documented that the use of assisted reproductive technology (ART) increases the risk for multiple births, which are associated with sub-optimal outcomes for pregnant women and their offspring. The occurrence ...