Harmonizing Regulations for Biomedical Research: A Critical Analysis of the US and Venezuelan Systems
Di Tillio-Gonzalez, Dannie
Fischbach, Ruth L.
Developing World Bioethics 2008 December; 8(3): 167-177
This article aims to compare the national legal systems that regulate biomedical research in an industrialized country (United States) and a developing country (Venezuela). A new international order is emerging in which Europe, Japan and the United States (US) are revising common guidelines and harmonizing standards. In this article, we analyze - as an example - the US system. This system is controlled by a federal agency structured to regulate research funded by the federal government uniformly, either in the US or abroad. In contrast, in Venezuela, a developing country, the creation of a centralized system is a slow process. Different types of ethical committees review research projects using non-uniform criteria. Consequently, various parallel organizations that conduct biomedical research, such as universities, research institutes and private hospitals have diverse regulations operating at a local level. Thus, the most relevant difference between the Venezuelan and the US systems is the degree of standardization. In the US, the review process is performed by institutional review boards (IRBs), which have a similar organization and maintain relationships with a centralized agency, following standard regulations. Although new proposals for establishing national regulations are currently being considered in Venezuela, the success of these initiatives will depend on promoting governmental efforts to create a more structured centralized system supported by a national regulatory framework. This system will need governmental financial support at all levels. This article proposes an integrated system to regulate research with human participants in Venezuela and other developing countries.
Biomedical Research; Developing Countries; Federal Government; Financial Support; Government; Guidelines; Hospitals; Institutional Review Boards; Organizations; Private Hospitals; Research; Research Institutes; Review; Standards; Universities; Human Experimentation Policy Guidelines / Institutional Review Boards; Social Control of Human Experimentation; International and Political Dimensions of Biology and Medicine;
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Loike, John; Gillick, Muriel; Mayer, Stephan; Prager, Kenneth; Simon, Jeremy R; Steinberg, Avraham; Tendler, Moshe D; Willig, Mordechai; Fischbach, Ruth L (2010-10)Culturally competent medical care for the dying patient by families and health care professionals is a challenging task especially when religious values, practices, and beliefs influence treatment decisions for patients ...
A Comparative Analysis of Biomedical Research Ethics Regulation Systems in Europe and Latin America With Regard to the Protection of Human Subjects Lamas, Eugenia; Ferrer, Marcela; Molina, Alberto; Salinas, Rodrigo; Hevia, Adriana; Bota, Alexandre; Feinholz, Dafna; Fuchs, Michael; Schramm, Roland; Tealdi, Juan-Carlos; Zorrilla, Sergio (2010-12)The European project European and Latin American Systems of Ethics Regulation of Biomedical Research Project (EULABOR) has carried out the first comparative analysis of ethics regulation systems for biomedical research in ...
Sughrue, Michael E.; Mocco, J.; Mack, Willam J.; Ducruet, Andrew F.; Komotar, Ricardo J.; Fischbach, Ruth L.; Martin, Thomas E.; Connolly, E. Sander, Jr. (2009-05)Controversy and activism have long been linked to the subject of primate research. Even in the midst of raging ethical debates surrounding fertility treatments, genetically modified foods and stem-cell research, there has ...