"Allow Natural Death" Is Not Equivalent to "Do Not Resuscitate": A Response
Journal of Medical Ethics 2008 December; 34(12): 887-888
Venneman and colleagues argue that "do not resuscitate" (DNR) is problematic and should be replaced by "allow natural death" (AND). Their argument is flawed. First, while end-of-life discussions should be as positive as possible, they cannot and should not sidestep painful but necessary confrontations with morality. Second, while DNR can indeed be nonspecific and confusing, AND merely replaces one problematic term with another. Finally, the study's results are not generalisable to the populations of physicians and working nurses and certainly do not support the authors' claim that there is a movement to replace DNR with AND.
Permanent LinkFind in a Library.
Full Text from Publisher
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Venneman, S.S.; Narnor-Harris, P.; Perish, M.; Hamilton, M. (2008-01)Physician-written "do not resuscitate" DNR orders elicit negative reactions from stakeholders that may decrease appropriate end-of-life care. The semantic significance of the phrase has led to a proposed replacement of DNR ...