Debriefing and Accountability in Deceptive Research
Miller, Franklin G.
Gluck, John P., Jr.
Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 2008 September; 18(3): 235-251
Debriefing is a standard ethical requirement for human research involving the use of deception. Little systematic attention, however, has been devoted to explaining the ethical significance of debriefing and the specific ethical functions that it serves. In this article, we develop an account of debriefing as a tool of moral accountability for the prima facie wrong of deception. Specifically, we contend that debriefing should include a responsibility to promote transparency by explaining the deception and its rationale, to provide an apology to subjects for infringing the principle of respect for persons, and to offer subjects an opportunity to withdraw their data. We also present recommendations concerning the discussion of deception in scientific articles reporting the results of research using deception.
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Chen, Donna T.; Rosenstein, Donald L.; Muthappan, Palaniappan; Hilsenbeck, Susan G.; Miller, Franklin G.; Emanuel, Ezekiel J.; Wendler, David (2005-03-28)BACKGROUND: There is widespread disagreement about the type of consent needed for research with stored biological samples. Many believe consent for each future use is required to respect individuals. Others worry this ...
Miller, Franklin G.; Wendler, David; Swartzman, Leora C. (2005-09)
Miller, Franklin G.; Wendler, David (2004-03)