Contraception and Anesthesia: A Reply to James DuBois
Christian Bioethics 2008 August; 14(2): 217-225
This is a response to James Dubois? "Is anesthesia intrinsically wrong?" I do not address many of the claims in this article but only DuBois? use of the moral evaluation of the medical use of anesthesia as a counter example to two lines of reasoning developed to defend the traditional Catholic prohibition of contraception. Elizabeth Anscombe's dialectical defense of this teaching does not imply that such a defense must logically apply to the use of anesthesia. John Finnis? defense of this teaching on the basis of a natural law argument does not imply that consciousness is a basic human good.
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Dubois, James M. (2008-08)This article engages two fundamentally different kinds of so-called natural law arguments in favor of specific moral absolutes: Elizabeth Anscombe's claim that certain actions are known to be intrinsically wrong through ...
Dubois, James M. (2008-12)
DuBois, James M. (2007-06)