Ethics Review of Research: In Pursuit of Proportionality
Journal of Medical Ethics 2008 July; 34(7): 568-572
The ethics review system of research is now well-established, at least in the developed world, although there are many differences in how countries view it and go about managing it. The UK specifically is now seeking to revise its system by speeding up the process of ethics approval but only for some studies. It is proposed that only those studies which pose "no material ethical issues" should be "fast-tracked". However, it is unclear what this means, who should decide and what should be included in this category. In this paper, we go some way towards answering these questions. While we are certain that the debate is only just beginning, we are equally certain that it will continue to run long after the system has been reformed. To stimulate this conversation and to inform a pilot project of the new system directly, we review two candidates to help give some substance to the notion of "material" ethical issues. Firstly, material could mean a certain type or degree of risk. Second, material could mean how physically invasive the research is. We conclude that there is still much work to be done on making the system of governing health and social care consistent and practicable.
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Environmental virtue ethics: a review of some current work [review of Ethics and Sustainability: Sustainable Development and the Moral Life, by Lisa Newton; Thoreau's Living Ethics: Walden and the Pursuit of Virtue, by Philip Cafaro; Environmental Virtue Ethics, edited by Ronald Sandler and Philip Cafaro] Holly, Marilyn (2006)