The Practicalities of Terminally Ill Patients Signing Their Own DNR Orders? A Study in Taiwan
Journal of Medical Ethics 2008 May; 34(5): 336-340
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the current situation of completing the informed consent for do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders among the competent patients with terminal illness and the ethical dilemmas related to it. PARTICIPANTS: This study enrolled 152 competent patients with terminal cancer, who were involved in the initial consultations for hospice care. Analysis: Comparisons of means, analyses of variance, Student's t test, chi(2) test and multiple logistic regression models. RESULTS: After the consultations, 117 (77.0%) of the 152 patients provided informed consent for hospice care and DNR orders. These included 21 patients (17.9%) who signed the consent by themselves, and 96 (82.1%) whose consent sheet was signed only by family members. The reasons why patients were not involved in the discussions toward the consent (n = 82) included poor physical or psychological condition (44.9%), concerns of the consultant hospice team (37.2%), and the family's refusal (28.2%). On a multivariate analysis, patients' awareness of their poor prognosis (odds ratio = 4.07, 95% confidence interval = 2.05 to 8.07) and their understanding of hospice care (2.27, 1.33 to 3.89) were two independent factors (p
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Factors That Influence the Participation of Healthcare Professionals in Advance Care Planning for Patients With Terminal Cancer: A Nationwide Survey in Taiwan Hu, Wen-Yu; Huang, Chien-Hsun; Chiu, Tai-Yuan; Hung, Shou-Hung; Peng, Jen-Kuei Chen, Ching-Yu (2010-06)A nationwide study was undertaken to investigate participation in advance care planning (ACP) by cancer care professionals following the enactment of the Natural Death Act in Taiwan in 2000. This multi-center study surveyed ...