Is Conscientious Objection Incompatible With a Physician's Professional Obligations?
Wicclair, Mark R.
Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 2008; 29(3): 171-185
In response to physicians who refuse to provide medical services that are contrary to their ethical and/or religious beliefs, it is sometimes asserted that anyone who is not willing to provide legally and professionally permitted medical services should choose another profession. This article critically examines the underlying assumption that conscientious objection is incompatible with a physician?s professional obligations (the ?incompatibility thesis?). Several accounts of the professional obligations of physicians are explored: general ethical theories (consequentialism, contractarianism, and rights-based theories), internal morality (essentialist and non-essentialist conceptions), reciprocal justice, social contract, and promising. It is argued that none of these accounts of a physician?s professional obligations unequivocally supports the incompatibility thesis.
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Wicclair, Mark R. (2000-07)Recognition of conscientious objection seems reasonable in relation to controversial and contentious issues, such as physician assisted suicide and abortion. However, physicians also advance conscience-based objections ...
Wicclair, Mark R. (2006-09)This paper examines the obligations of pharmacy licensees and pharmacists in the context of conscience-based objections to filling lawful prescriptions for certain types of medications--e.g., standard and emergency ...