Dis-Orienting Paraphilias? Disability, Desire, and the Question of (Bio)ethics
Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 2008; 5(2-3): 183-192
In 1977 John Money published the first modern case histories of what he called ?apotemnophilia?, literally meaning ?amputation love? [Money et al., The Journal of Sex Research, 13(2):115?12523, 1977], thus from its inception as a clinically authorized phenomenon, the desire for the amputation of a healthy limb or limbs was constituted as a sexual perversion conceptually related to other so-called paraphilias. This paper engages with sex-based accounts of amputation-related desires and practices, not in order to substantiate the paraphilic model, but rather, because the conception of these (no doubt) heterogeneous desires and practices as symptoms of a paraphilic condition (or conditions) highlights some interesting cultural assumptions about ?disability? and ?normalcy?, their seemingly inherent (un)desirability, and their relation to sexuality. In critically interrogating the socio-political conditions that structure particular desires and practices such that they are lived as improper, distressing and/or disabling, the paper constitutes an exercise in what Margrit Shildrick [Beyond the body of bioethics: Challenging the conventions. In M. Shildrick and R. Mykitiuk (Eds.), Ethics of the body: Postconventional challenges (pp. 1?26). New York: MIT Press, 2005] refers to as ?postconventional ethics?.
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Shaw, Rhonda; Sullivan, Martin (2003-06)In the social sciences, debates about the discursive and material constitution of subjectivity and identity no longer appear to be at loggerheads. This has important implications for how we are to construct a framework for ...