The Primacy of the Public: In Support of Bioethics Commissions as Deliberative Forums
Dzur, Albert W.
Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 2007 June; 17(2): 133-142
In a 2004 article, we argued that bioethics commissions should be assessed in terms of their usefulness as public forums. A 2006 article by Summer Johnson argued that our perspective was not supported by the existing literature on presidential commissions, which had not previously identified commissions as public forums and that we did not properly account for the political functions of commissions as instruments of presidential power. Johnson also argued that there was nothing sufficiently unique about bioethics commissions to make the public forum perspective particularly applicable. We respond by arguing that analysis of commissions' work as public forums fits well within the literature on commissions, especially on their agenda-setting functions, and that the political functions of commissions are often compatible with their functioning as public forums. We also demonstrate how the origins and concerns of bioethics make public forum analysis particularly applicable to bioethics commissions.
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Dzur, Albert W. (2002-04)The increased presence of moral consultants, or bioethicists, within hospitals and clinics in the last two decades has begun to raise questions about their sources of authority and norms of practice. Under pressure from ...
Multiple Roles and Successes in Public Bioethics: A Response to the Public Forum Critique of Bioethics Commissions Johnson, Summer (2006-06)National bioethics commissions have been critiqued for a variety of structural, procedural, and political aspects of their work. A more recent critique published by Dzur and Levin uses political philosophy to constructively ...