Should Research Ethics Committees Be Told How to Think?
Journal of Medical Ethics 2007 January; 33(1): 39-42
Research ethics committees (RECs) are charged with providing an opinion on whether research proposals are ethical. These committees are overseen by a central office that acts for the Department of Health and hence the State. An advisory group has recently reported back to the Department of Health, recommending that it should deal with (excessive) inconsistency in the decisions made by different RECs. This article questions the desirability and feasibility of questing for consistent ethical decisions.
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Sugarman, Jeremy (1994)...Empirical research by ethics committees should provide a common language for the discussion of contemporary problems in healthcare ethics and may identify procedures that help attenuate the difficulties associated ...
Sheehan, M. (2008-08)Currently, research ethics committees (RECs) in the UK meet behind closed doors?their workings and most of the content of their decisions are unavailable to the general public. There is a significant tension between this ...