The Original Risk: Overtheologizing Ethics and Undertheologizing Sin
Christian Bioethics 2007 January-April; (13)1: 7-23
The project of articulating a theological ethics on the basis of liturgical anthropology is bound to fail if the necessary consequence is that one has to quit the forum of critical modern rationality. The risk of Engelhardt's approach is to limit rationality to a narrow vision of reason. Sin is not to be understood as the negation of human holiness, but as the negation of divine holiness. The only way to renew theological ethics is to understand sin as the anthropological and ethical expression of the biblical message of the justification by faith only. Sin is therefore a secondary category, which can only by interpreted in light of the positive manifestation of liberation, justification, and grace. The central issue of Christian ethics is not ritual purity or morality, but experience, confession and recognition of our own injustice in our dealing with God and men.
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Müller, Denis (2009-04)In order to avoid both religious intolerance and religious indifference, we need to develop a positive notion of an open laicity or secularity that permits us to respect our religiously plural as well as secular contemporary ...
Müller, Denis (2008)
McNamee, Michael John; Müller, Arno; van Hilvoorde, Ivo; Holm, Søren (2009)