Show simple item record

dc.creatorMalek, Janeten
dc.date.accessioned2016-01-08T23:27:06Zen
dc.date.available2016-01-08T23:27:06Zen
dc.date.created2007en
dc.date.issued2007en
dc.identifierdoi:10.1007/978-1-4020-6260-5en
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationIn: Cherry, Mark J.; Iltis, Ana Smith, eds. Pluralistic Casuistry: Moral Arguments, Economic Realities, and Political Theory. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer, 2007: 49-64en
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6260-5en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10822/967838en
dc.formatBook Chapteren
dc.languageenen
dc.sourceeweb:302695en
dc.subject.classificationPhilosophical Ethicsen
dc.subject.classificationSuicide / Assisted Suicideen
dc.subject.classificationProlongation of Life and Euthanasiaen
dc.subject.classificationPhilosophy of Medicineen
dc.titleMoral Judgment and the Ideal Intuitor: Dealing With Moral Confusion and Moral Disagreementen
dc.provenanceCitation prepared by the Library and Information Services group of the Kennedy Institute of Ethics, Georgetown University for the ETHXWeb database.en
dc.provenanceCitation migrated from OpenText LiveLink Discovery Server database named EWEB hosted by the Bioethics Research Library to the DSpace collection EthxWeb hosted by DigitalGeorgetown.en


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


Georgetown University Seal
©2009—2018 Bioethics Research Library
Box 571212 Washington DC 20057-1212
202.687.3885