Social and Behavioral Researchers? Experiences With Their IRBs
Ashcraft, Mark H.
Krause, Jeremy A.
Ethics and Behavior 2007; 17(1): 1-17
A national survey on researchers? experiences with their institutional review boards (IRBs) is presented, focused exclusively on social and behavioral researchers. A wide range of experiences is apparent in the data, especially in terms of turnaround time for submitted protocols, incidence of data collection without prior IRB approval, and stated reasons for ?going solo.? Sixty-two percent felt that the turnaround time they typically experience is ?reasonable,? and 44% said they had not experienced long delays in obtaining approval. However, 48% of respondents reported either conducting a project without IRB approval or modifying an existing project without IRB approval, with anticipated time for approval being the dominant reason offered for doing so. This adds a new dimension to the widely discussed ?national IRB crisis? (e.g., Illinois White Paper, 2005). The article concludes with 2 preliminary recommendations for IRB reform.
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Protecting the Privacy of Third-Party Information: Recommendations for Social and Behavioral Health Researchers Lounsbury, David W.; Reynolds, Thomas C.; Rapkin, Bruce D.; Robson, Mark E.; Ostroff, Jamie (2007-01)
Wood, Jeremy (2003-09)
Researcher Experiences With IRBs: A Survey of Members of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology Wisner, Katherine L; Conley, Robert R; Taylor, Stephan F; Kosten, Thomas; Rapaport, Mark Hyman; Brown, Lawrence S (2011-09)