Are Newborns Morally Different From Older Children?
Bauer, Karen Lynn
Lantos, John D.
Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 2007; 28(5): 413-425
Policies and position statements regarding decision-making for extremely premature babies exist in many countries and are often directive, focusing on parental choice and expected outcomes. These recommendations often state survival and handicap as reasons for optional intervention. The fact that such outcome statistics would not justify such approaches in other populations suggests that some other powerful factors are at work. The value of neonatal intensive care has been scrutinized far more than intensive care for older patients and suggests that neonatal care is held to a higher standard of justification. The relative value placed on the life of newborns, in particular the preterm, is less than expected by any objective medical data or any prevailing moral frameworks about the value of individual lives. Why do we feel less obligated to treat the premature baby? Do we put newborns in a special and lesser moral category? We explore this question from a legal and ethical perspective and offer several hypotheses pertaining to personhood, reproductive choices, "precious children," and probable evolutionary and anthropological factors.
Permanent LinkFind in a Library
Full Text from Publisher
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Janvier, Annie; Okah, Felix; Farlow, Barbara; Lantos, John D (2011-04)Decisions for critically ill infants with trisomy 18 raise thorny issues about values, futility, the burdens of treatment, cost-effectiveness, and justice. We presented the case of an infant with trisomy 18 to 2 neonatologists ...
Laventhal, Naomi; Spelke, M Bridget; Andrews, Bree; Larkin, L Knoll; Meadow, William; Janvier, Annie (2011-05)We surveyed US neonatologists and high-risk obstetricians about preferences for resuscitation in ethically difficult situations to determine whether (1) their responses adhered to traditional ethical principles of best ...