Using a New Analysis of the Best Interests Standard to Address Cultural Disputes: Whose Data, Which Values?
Kopelman, Loretta M.
Kopelman, Arthur E.
Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 2007; 28(5): 373-391
Clinicians sometimes disagree about how much to honor surrogates' deeply held cultural values or traditions when they differ from those of the host country. Such a controversy arose when parents requested a cultural accommodation to let their infant die by withdrawing life saving care. While both the parents and clinicians claimed to be using the Best Interests Standard to decide what to do, they were at an impasse. This standard is analyzed into three necessary and jointly sufficient conditions and used to resolve the question of how much to accommodate cultural preferences and how to treat this infant. The extreme versions of absolutism and relativism are rejected. Properly understood, the Best Interests Standard can serve as a powerful tool in settling disputes about how to make good decisions for those who cannot decide for themselves.
Permanent LinkFind in a Library.
Full Text from Publisher
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Using the best interests standard to decide whether to test children for untreatable, late-onset genetic diseases Kopelman, Loretta M. (2007-07)A new analysis of the Best Interests Standard is given and applied to the controversy about testing children for untreatable, severe late-onset genetic diseases, such as Huntington's disease or Alzheimer's disease. A ...
Kopelman, Loretta M. (2005-08)Two incompatible policies exist for guiding medical decisions for extremely premature, sick, or terminally ill infants, the Best Interests Standard and the newer, 20-year old "Baby Doe" Rules. The background, including why ...