dc.creator | Brecher, B. | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-01-08T23:28:34Z | en |
dc.date.available | 2016-01-08T23:28:34Z | en |
dc.date.created | 2006-09 | en |
dc.date.issued | 2006-09 | en |
dc.identifier | doi:10.1136/jme.2005.014704 | en |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | Journal of Medical Ethics 2006 September; 32(9): 511-512 | en |
dc.identifier.uri | http://worldcatlibraries.org/registry/gateway?version=1.0&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&atitle=Why+the+Kantian+ideal+survives+medical+learning+curves,+and+why+it+matters&title=Journal+of+Medical+Ethics+&volume=32&issue=9&date=2006-09&au=Brecher,+B. | en |
dc.identifier.uri | http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jme.2005.014704 | en |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10822/970610 | en |
dc.description.abstract | The "Kantian ideal" is often misunderstood as invoking individual autonomy rather than rational self legislation. Le Morvan and Stock's otherwise insightful discussion of "Medical learning curves and the Kantian ideal"--for example--draws the mistaken inference that that ideal is inconsistent with the realities of medical practice. But it is not. Rationally to be a patient entails accepting its necessary conditions. | en |
dc.format | Article | en |
dc.language | en | en |
dc.source | eweb:298953 | en |
dc.subject | Autonomy | en |
dc.subject | Legislation | en |
dc.subject.classification | Philosophical Ethics | en |
dc.subject.classification | Education for Health Care Professionals | en |
dc.subject.classification | Patient Relationships | en |
dc.title | Why the Kantian Ideal Survives Medical Learning Curves, and Why It Matters | en |
dc.provenance | Citation prepared by the Library and Information Services group of the Kennedy Institute of Ethics, Georgetown University for the ETHXWeb database. | en |
dc.provenance | Citation migrated from OpenText LiveLink Discovery Server database named EWEB hosted by the Bioethics Research Library to the DSpace collection EthxWeb hosted by DigitalGeorgetown. | en |