Review of a Mock Research Protocol in Functional Neuroimaging by Canadian Research Ethics Boards
de Champlain, J.
Journal of Medical Ethics 2006 September; 32(9): 530-534
To examine how research ethics boards (REBs) review research projects in emerging disciplines such as functional neuroimaging. DESIGN: To compare the criteria applied and the decisions reached by REBs that reviewed the same mock research protocol in functional neuroimaging. PARTICIPANTS: 44 Canadian biomedical REBs, mostly working in public university or hospital settings. MAIN MEASUREMENTS: The mock research protocol "The Neurobiology of Social Behavior" included several ethical issues operating at all three levels: personal, institutional and social. Data consisting of responses to closed questions were analysed quantitatively. Qualitative analysis of open-question responses used mixed classification. RESULTS: Similar criteria were used by most participating REBs. Yet the project was unconditionally approved by 3 REBs, approved conditionally by 10 and rejected by 30. CONCLUSIONS: The results point to the difficulty for REBs of reviewing all kinds of research projects, regardless of field, by relying on international and national norms framed in general terms and a possible variation between REBs in the interpretation of their mandate for the protection of research subjects.
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Pan-Canadian Study on Variations in Research Ethics Boards' Reviews of a Research Project Involving Placebo Use Patenaude, Johane; Cabanac, Julien; de Champlain, Johane (2006)
Deslauriers, C.; Bell, E.; Palmour, N.; Pike, B.; Doyon, J.; Racine, E. (2010-03)The current and potential uses of neuroimaging in healthcare and beyond have spurred discussion about the ethical issues related to neuroimaging and neuroimaging research. This study examined the perspectives of neuroimagers ...
Protecting and Promoting the Human Research Subject: A Review of the Function of Research Ethics Boards in Canadian Faculties of Medicine Unknown author (National Council on Bioethics in Human Research (Canada). Working Group on Evaluation, 1995-12)