Show simple item record

dc.creatorKoppelman-White, Elysaen
dc.date.accessioned2016-01-08T23:29:12Zen
dc.date.available2016-01-08T23:29:12Zen
dc.date.created2006-07en
dc.date.issued2006-07en
dc.identifierdoi:10.1080/08989620600848611en
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationAccountability in Research 2006 July-September; 13(3): 225-246en
dc.identifier.urihttp://worldcatlibraries.org/registry/gateway?version=1.0&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&atitle=Research+misconduct+and+the+scientific+process:+continuing+quality+improvement&title=Accountability+in+Research+&volume=13&issue=3&date=2006-07&au=Koppelman-White,+Elysaen
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08989620600848611en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10822/971712en
dc.description.abstractThe response to research misconduct involves the attempt to regulate behavior through (a) creating and enforcing a rule and (b) ethics education. The roles of each must be shaped by considerations of the nature of scientific practice. Given the nature of science, the role of (a) must be limited in scope: both in the types of behavior it covers and in the level of intent that must be present for an allegation of misconduct to be proven. Since one important role of ethics education is to fill the gaps that regulatory rules leave open, it is this limitation in scope and its source in theoretical concerns that better reveals the type and kind of education needed. It is argued that much of the current ethics education falls short. Since the gaps left by the rule are largely due to theoretical concerns about the very nature of the scientific process and the nature of that process is constantly evolving, ethics education must focus more heavily on theory and must reach a wider audience. It is argued that ethics education can be more effective if it aims, in part, in creating a discipline-specific, constantly evolving standard of care.en
dc.formatArticleen
dc.languageenen
dc.sourceeweb:297584en
dc.subjectEducationen
dc.subjectEthicsen
dc.subjectMisconducten
dc.subjectNatureen
dc.subjectResearchen
dc.subjectScienceen
dc.subject.classificationBioethics Educationen
dc.subject.classificationScientific Research Ethicsen
dc.titleResearch Misconduct and the Scientific Process: Continuing Quality Improvementen
dc.provenanceCitation prepared by the Library and Information Services group of the Kennedy Institute of Ethics, Georgetown University for the ETHXWeb database.en
dc.provenanceCitation migrated from OpenText LiveLink Discovery Server database named EWEB hosted by the Bioethics Research Library to the DSpace collection EthxWeb hosted by DigitalGeorgetown.en


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


Georgetown University Seal
©2009—2022 Bioethics Research Library
Box 571212 Washington DC 20057-1212
202.687.3885