Show simple item record

dc.creatorWager, E.en
dc.creatorParkin, E.C.en
dc.creatorTamber, P.S.en
dc.date.accessioned2016-01-08T23:32:53Zen
dc.date.available2016-01-08T23:32:53Zen
dc.date.created2006-05-30en
dc.date.issued2006-05-30en
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationBMC Medicine 2006 May 30; 4: 13en
dc.identifier.urihttp://worldcatlibraries.org/registry/gateway?version=1.0&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&atitle=Are+reviewers+suggested+by+authors+as+good+as+those+chosen+by+editors?+Results+of+a+rater-blinded,+retrospective+study&title=BMC+Medicine+&volume=&issue=&date=2006-05&au=Wager,+E.;+Parkin,+E.C.;+Tamber,+P.S.en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10822/972472en
dc.formatArticleen
dc.languageenen
dc.sourceeweb:296617en
dc.subject.classificationJournalism / Mass Media Ethicsen
dc.subject.classificationScientific Research Ethicsen
dc.titleAre Reviewers Suggested by Authors as Good as Those Chosen by Editors? Results of a Rater-Blinded, Retrospective Studyen
dc.provenanceCitation prepared by the Library and Information Services group of the Kennedy Institute of Ethics, Georgetown University for the ETHXWeb database.en
dc.provenanceCitation migrated from OpenText LiveLink Discovery Server database named EWEB hosted by the Bioethics Research Library to the DSpace collection EthxWeb hosted by DigitalGeorgetown.en


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


Georgetown University Seal
©2009—2022 Bioethics Research Library
Box 571212 Washington DC 20057-1212
202.687.3885